BLTC Press Titles


available for Kindle at Amazon.com


The Haunted Bookshop

Christopher Morely


Some Experiences of an Irish R. M.

Edith Somerville and Martin Ross


The Art of Worldly Wisdom

Baltasar Gracian


Shakti and Shakta

John Woodroffe


Classified models of speech composition

by James Milton O'Neill

Excerpt:

and a special jury, 1781.]

The occasion which led to the prosecution of Lord Gordon will be familiar to readers of Dickens' "Barnaby Rudge." Lord Gordon, an enthusiastic young Scottish nobleman, had been chosen president of the Protestant Association, whose object was to procure the repeal of Sir George Saville's act in favor of the Catholics. This statute, which simply relieved the Roman Catholic subjects of England from some of the penalties to which they had long been subject, did not apply to Scotland. The winter following its passage, a movement was begun to extend its provisions to Scotland. This produced tumult in Edinburgh, in which some popish chapels and mass houses were destroyed, and further efforts in this direction were abandoned. A great number of Protestant societies were soon formed in Scotland and in England for the purpose of petitioning parliament to repeal Sir Georg; Saville's act, which was represented at their meetings, and branded in their publications, as fraught with danger to the constitution. Their resolutions and petitions were publicly printed and distributed for several months, with a view to influencing parliament. At length, as president of the London Association, Lord Gordon directed the members to meet him in St. George's Fields, and proceed thence to the parliament house with a petition for the repeal of the bill. Accordingly, on the second of June, 1780, about forty thousand persons, composed mostly of the middle classes, assembled and blocked up all the avenues to the house of commons. They were not armed, and most of them were orderly in their conduct, though individuals among them insulted some members of parliament who were passing into the building, requiring them to put blue cockades on their hats, and to cry, "No popery." Lord Gordon presented the petition, but the house refused, by a vote of 192 to 6, to consider it at that time. The multitude then became disorderly, and the whole affair took a serious turn. Bodies of men proceeded to demolish the Catholic chapels at the residences of the foreign ministers. Desperate men took the lead; the London prisons were broken open and destroyed; thirty-six fires were started at various points during the night; Lord Mansfield's house was destroyed; breweries and distilleries were broken open, and the mob became infuriated with liquor. The government was taken by surprise, and for several days the city was completely in the power of the mob. The militia were at last called in from the country, and the riot put down; not, however, until nearly five hundred persons had been killed or wounded, exclusive of those who perished from the effects of intoxication.

Thomas (lord) Erskine. Born at Edinburgh, January 10, 1750; educated at St . Andrews University; called to the bar at Lincoln Inn, London, July. 1778; in 1806 was made Lord Chancellor and elevated to the peerage; died at Linhthgowsnire, Scotland. November 17, 1823.

Lord Gordon was promptly arraigned for high treason. The trial came on before Chief Justice Mansfield and a special jury in the court of king's bench. The attorney general appeared for the crown. Lloyd Kenyon (afterwards chief justice) and Thomas Erskine represented the defendant. The prosecution contended that the prisoner, in assembling the multitude round the houses of parliament, if he did so with a view to overawe and intimidate the legislature, and enforce his purposes by numbers and violence, was guilty of treason in levying war against the king in his realm, within the statute of treasons of Edward III.,—a doctrine which was fully confirmed by the court. It was contended, moreover, that the overt acts proved might fairly be construed into such a design, being, in fact, the only evidence by which a traitorous design, in such a case, could be shown. After Kenyon had opened the case for the prisoner, Erskine having claimed the privilege of speaking to the whole evidence, the witnesses for the defense were called. The Rev. Mr. Middleton, a member of the Protestant Association, testified to the prisoner's loyalty to the king and attachment to the constitution; that his speeches at the meetings of the association never contained an expression tending directly or indirectly to a repeal of the bill by force; that he desired the people not even to carry sticks in the procession, and begged that riotous persons might be delivered to the constable. Dr. Evans, an eminent surgeon, declared that he saw the prisoner in St. George's Fields, and that his conduct and expressions indicated that he wished and endeavored to prevent all disorder. This was confirmed by others; and it was proved that the bulk of the people around the parliament house and in the lobby were not members of the association, but idlers, vagabonds, and pickpockets, who had thrust themselves in, so that the persons who had insulted the members were of a totally different class from those who formed the original gathering. The Earl of Lonsdale, who took the prisoner home from the house in his carriage, swore that Lord Gordon, in reply to inquiries from the great multitudes surrounding him as to the fate of the petition, answered that it was uncertain, and earnestly entreated them to retire to their homes and be quiet. It was past midnight when the evidence was all in. Erskine then addressed the jury in the following speech. It will be observed that Erskine did not take issue with the authorities as to what constituted treason. "If it had been proved," he said, "that the same multitude, under the direction of Lord George Gordon, had afterwards attacked the bank, broke open the prisons, and set London in a conflagration, I should not now be addressing you." In other words, such acts would have been treason by levying war, and actually were so in the case of those who committed them. The defense was that Lord Gordon had nothing to do with the riots, which were, so far as he was concerned, the unintended and unexpected consequences of his imprudent conduct in putting himself at the head of a mob for the purpose of tumultuous petitioning. And Chief Justice Mansfield charged the jury that, "if this multitude assembled with intent, by acts of force and violence, to compel the legislature to repeal the law, it is high treason." The jury withdrew at three o'clock in the morning, and promptly returned with a verdict of not guilty.1 Veeder's "Legal Masterpieces," pp. 44-46.

Gentlemen Of The Jury: Mr. Kenyon having informed the court that we propose to call no other witnesses, it is now my duty to address myself to you as counsel for the noble prisoner at the bar, the whole evidence being closed. I use the word "closed" because it certainly is not finished, since I have been obliged to leave the seat in which I sat to disentangle myself from the volumes of men's names which lay there under my feet, whose testimony, had it been necessary for the defense, would have confirmed all the facts that are already in evidence before you.

1 zi Howell. St. Tr. 485.

Gentlemen, I feel myself entitled to expect, both from you and from the court, the greatest indulgence and attention. I am, indeed, a greater object of your compassion than even my noble friend whom I am defending. He rests secure in conscious innocence, and in the well-placed assurance that it can suffer no stain in your hands. Not so with me. I stand before you a troubled, I am afraid a guilty, man, in having presumed to accept of the awful task which I am now called upon to perform,—a task which my learned friend who spoke before me, though he has justly risen, by extraordinary capacity and experience, to the highest rank in his profession, has spoken of with that distrust and diffidence which becomes every Christian in a cause of blood. If Mr. Kenyon has such feelings, think what mine must be! Alas! gentlemen, who am I? A young man of little experience, unused to the bar of criminal courts, and sinking under the dreadful consciousness of my defects. I have, however, this consolation: that no ignorance nor inattention on my part can possibly prevent you from seeing, under the direction of the judges, that the crown has established no case of treason.


... from the RetroRead library, using Google Book Search, and download any of the books already converted to Kindle format.

Browse the 100 most recent additions to the RetroRead library

Browse the library alphabetically by title

Make books:

Login or register to convert Google epubs to Kindle ebooks

username:

password:

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Register here, and convert any Google epub you wish


Powerd by Calibre powered by calibre